We're very busy serving you, our constituents as well and as quickly in all manners that we can. We haven't had quite enough time to tweet lately, but with just a bit of prodding we'll surely have something for you soon! Stay tuned!
Our full Twitter Feed is available.As the second week of session winds down, I’d like to update you on what’s shaping up to be an interesting, if challenging, session.
As a result of declining revenues and the economic downturn, we will make difficult choices this session and will have to adopt painful cuts. These decisions will not be popular and I know that I won’t enjoy them, but I firmly believe that the only clear path to growth and prosperity is to preserve Virginia’s well-deserved reputation as a great state in which to do business, and to avoid imposing new tax burdens on our hard-working citizens and the businesses which serve as engines of growth and development.
On Monday evening, Governor McDonnell delivered his State of the Commonwealth address a joint assembly of the legislature. It was his second major address in three days, coming on the heels of his stirring inaugural address, and he won’t get to let up yet: our new governor is delivering the response to the State of the Union Address next week.
In his State of the Commonwealth Address, McDonnell expressed his understanding that we can’t tax our way out of this recession. He talked about transportation, economic development, and the need for significant funding cuts. Our challenge is to make these reductions as painless as possible, while recognizing that no one will be spared entirely.
I look forward to working with the Governor, and I’ve been working to find ways to give localities and essential service providers the tools they need to get through the rough patch. I know the importance of ensuring that each child receives a quality education, so I have worked with my local school boards to develop a legislative package that provides school divisions with greater flexibility to use state dollars where they are needed the most urgently. If schools have to be asked to do more with less, the least we can do is make sure they can use state funding in the classroom, putting more money toward instruction and less toward legislators’ pet projects.
I also recognize how critical it is that we maintain our transportation infrastructure. The transportation budget has taken a beating these past few years, and we haven’t turned the corner yet, but when we do, I want to make sure that transportation has a place at the table, which is why I’ve introduced legislation proposing that once we’re well on the road to economic recovery and have enjoyed a degree of revenue growth, an additional half a penny of the sales tax will be dedicated to transportation. This won’t take anything from other agencies or programs – the allocation is made out of revenue growth – but it’s a way to ensure that transportation isn’t neglected as our economy ultimately recovers.
We may only have a week and a half of session behind us, but the foolishness starts early: on Monday, a “dangerous dog” bill went down – thankfully – to defeat. Nobody likes a dangerous dog, but had this bill passed, any dog that reasonably induced fear that it may attempt to attack or inflict injury would constitute a dangerous dog. What would that entail? Growling? Tugging on a leash and barking?
The other day, Governor McDonnell announced, in keeping with his campaign promise, that all of the closed rest areas will reopen by April 15th. Studies show that rest areas decrease the accident rate by nearly 4%, and they help get parked trucks off exit ramps, where they pose a serious hazard. Reopening the rest areas has been one of my priorities since their politically motivated closure, and I’m pleased to be able to report that we’re on track to make our interstates safer and more inviting.
Elsewhere, in a political stunner, Republican Scott Brown won a special election and will be the next U.S. Senator from Massachusetts. I’ll put it this way: when Massachusetts is a little unsure about President Obama’s agenda, it’s not too hard to figure out where everyone else is.
I’ll close this already long update with a list of a few of the bills I’ve introduced this session. You can find all of my bills listed here.
Closing the Triggerman Loophole (SB 7)
Under the current law, prosecutors cannot seek a charge of capital murder if a criminal defendant who willfully and deliberately participated in a premeditated murder did not actually pull the trigger. It is a distinction unheard of in common law and unknown to Virginian law until 1979, and my bill would bring Virginia in line with the majority of states who make no such distinction.
Transportation Trust Fund (SB 132)
This proposal ensures that future revenue growth is set aside for transportation projects by permanently moving a half cent of the existing sales tax to the TTF.
Tax Credits for Donations to Nonprofits (SB 133)
This bill establishes tax credits for businesses that donate to nonprofit organizations providing educational funding – the Educational Improvement Tax Credit.
Voter Identification Requirements (SB 134)
This bill aims to curb election fraud by requiring that voters show some form of identification when voting.
In God We Trust License Plates (SB 136)
Authorizes the issuance of special “In God We Trust” license plates.
Audit of Transportation Programs (SB 351)
This legislation requires a performance audit of VDOT by a private auditing firm. Given dramatic decline in transportation funding, reprioritization is essential, and an outside performance audit will help the Transportation secretariat institute best practices, reduce overhead, eliminate inefficiencies and redundancies, and determine which functions can be privatized cost-effectively.
Privatization of ABC Stores (SB 443)
Providing for regional auctions of licenses for the private retail sale of alcoholic beverages in lieu of state-run ABC stores. This proposal has been adopted by the Governor as a major component of his government reform and transportation agendas.
Eminent Domain Reform (SJ 27)
A constitutional amendment that would limit the exercise of eminent domain for the purpose of public use. It specifies that, with the exception of property taken for public service corporations, public service companies, or railroads, property may not be taken if the primary purpose of the taking is private financial gain, private benefit, an increase in tax base or tax revenues, or an increase in employment.
Education Bills (SB 135, SB 352, SB 353, and budget amendment)
Legislation easing the burden on local school divisions by granting them greater flexibility to spend state-provided funding on their most urgent priorities.
I look forward to keeping in touch with you as session proceeds, and I hope you’ll keep in touch as well, as I always enjoy hearing from my constituents.
Mark Obenshain
Virginia State Senator
P.S. If you have not yet taken my constituent survey, please do so at www.markobenshain.com today!
Article Content
Born in Richmond, Virginia, June 11, 1962; educated at Virginia Tech (B.A., 1984); Washington and Lee University School of Law (J.D., 1987); attorney; married Suzanne Speas Obenshain; member: Presbyterian Church; Member of Senate: 2004-.
Contact Information:
Mailing:
P.O. Box 555
Harrisonburg, VA 22803
Phone: (540) 437-1451
Fax: (540) 437-3101
Email:
mark@markobenshain.com
Website:
Senate Democrats today exercised an extreme power grab when they passed a committee resolution reducing Republican clout on a number of influential committees. The committee assignments were altered as a result of the changes in the membership of the Senate following the elections of Sen. Ken Stolle as Virginia Beach Sheriff and Sen. Ken Cuccinelli as Attorney General of Virginia.
The new committee assignments change the make up of the budget-writing Senate Finance Committee from 9 Democrats and 7 Republicans to 9 Democrats and 6 Republicans as the seat vacated by Sen. Stolle was left unfilled. On the Courts of Justice Committee that vets judges and handles matters related to criminal and civil law, the make up was changed from 8 Democrats and 7 Republicans to 10 Democrats and 5 Republicans. The seats vacated by Stolle and Cuccinelli were filled by Democrats Don McEachin and Chap Petersen. The Commerce and Labor Committee that addresses business and utility issues moved from 8 Democrats and 7 Republicans to 9 Democrats and 6 Republicans. The seat vacated by Sen. Stolle was filled by Democrat Creigh Deeds.
The Rules of the Senate require proportional representation so that the party controls the same percentage of seats on committees that they control in the chamber. Based on this committee resolution, Democrats control four more seats than they are allotted under the rules of the Senate.
A number of Republican Senators expressed their distaste with the actions of the majority while the resolution was being considered on the Senate floor. A video showing the highlights of these speeches by Senators Tommy Norment (James City), William Wampler (Bristol), and Mark Obenshain (Harrisonburg) is attached.
RICHMOND—Today, Senator Mark Obenshain (R-Harrisonburg) questioned the partisan effort of the Senate Committee on Privileges and Elections to act to ensure the continued integrity of the electoral process in Virginia. “Voter identification requirements are a commonsense way to ensure that elections are free and fair,” said Obenshain, whose Senate Bill 134 was passed by indefinitely in committee on a 6-5 party line vote. “Fraudulent or erroneously counted ballots reduce the impact of legitimately-cast votes and are unfair to everyone involved.”
“Opponents of this measure like to counter voter identification requirements by pointing out how few people are prosecuted for voter fraud, but this misses the point,” said Obenshain. “Firstly, because we currently allow people to vote without showing any form of identification, we have no way to even detect voter fraud. Secondly, how many fraudulently cast ballots must there be for us to take simple steps to ensure the integrity of our elections?”
“Some like to insist that there isn't a problem,” said Obenshain, “but that's naïve. A John Hopkins University Study identified 1,500 deceased Marylanders who had ‘voted' in recent elections, and one county in New Mexico found seventy-five registrants at a single address. Right here in Virginia, campaign headquarters, vacant lots, and non-existent addresses have all been listed on many registration forms.”
Obenshain's voter identification bill would require voters to show some form of identification at the polls, and expands the list of identifying documents to include utility bills, bank statements, paychecks, and government checks. Currently, individuals who fail to bring identification may vote by signing a statement in lieu of showing identification.
“Right now, even if the registrar somehow discovered that a voter wasn't who he claimed on Election Day, there's nothing they could do; there would be no way to find and remove a ballot even if it was later determined to be fraudulently cast,” said Obenshain. “Had my bill passed, those who arrived at their polling place without any form of identification could cast a provisional ballot, which would be counted if they were able to demonstrate their identification before the certification of election results.”
The Supreme Court has upheld similar laws in other states, and by adding alternative forms of identification, Obenshain's bill ensures that no eligible voter is disenfranchised by the inability to produce the forms of identification required under current law. In 2005, the bipartisan Carter-Baker Panel, headed by former president Jimmy Carter and former secretary of State James Baker, recommended identification requirements stricter than the ones contained in this legislation.
“This is not about making it harder to vote or keeping anyone from voting,” Obenshain added. “It's about making sure that every legitimate vote counts, and that those votes are not diluted by voter fraud.”
“I was disappointed by the partisan nature of the opposition to this initiative, but not surprised,” said Obenshain. “Whether they wish to admit it or not, though, voter fraud is an issue, and simple, commonsense safeguards like these will go a long way to ensure that our elections remain above reproach.”
Senator Obenshain represents the twenty-sixth district in the Virginia Senate. The district includes the city of Harrisonburg and the counties of Warren, Shenandoah, Page, Rappahannock and Rockingham (part).
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Gone With the Wind: The Budget,
Voter ID, and Yes, Clotheslines,
in the Senate of Virginia
Another week of session is behind us, and although actual budget negotiations still lie ahead, producing a balanced budget remains the matter on everyones mind.
The budget will be balanced, of course; the law requires it. The real question is how well go about it, and thats where the members of the General Assembly go their separate ways. One of my colleagues across the aisle, Senator Edd Houck, made it clear where the other side stands, calling for tax increases and speaking of the importance of preserving government jobs. Houcks most likely target is the car tax cutting the $950 million reimbursement to local governments, which will result in re-imposition of the full car tax and an additional bill, likely to average between $450 and $600, for virtually every household in Virginia.
No one wants layoffs, and certainly, one hopes that any necessary staff reductions will come through eliminating vacant posts, but my colleagues comments underscore a fundamental difference of opinion on the governments role and function. Governments employ people, and many of those employees are fine civil servants, but governments do not exist for the purpose of employing people; they exist to provide essential services. If we can deliver those services more efficiently, we must do so.
Governor McDonnell has made it clear that he will not sign any budget that includes tax hikes, I firmly believe that we can meet our budget challenges without raising taxes, but to do that, we all need to be on the same page and soon. The House of Delegates recently voted 97-0 to reject Tim Kaines income tax surcharge proposal, and I strongly believe that the Senate should follow suit, allowing us to all work from the knowledge that tax hikes are not on the table.
Yesterday, fourteen other members of the General Assembly and I unveiled the legislative priorities of the Conservative Caucus, a group I co-chair with Delegate Ben Cline which exists to provide a forum for conservative members of both chambers to discuss and work with each other to advance a commonsense conservative agenda. You can read the full agenda, which includes several of my bills, here.
Another one of my bills died on a party line vote in committee this week. The bill, which would have required voters to provide some form of identification, is a simple, commonsense approach that has met with bipartisan support in other states. People disagree on the extent and impact of voter fraud, but we should all agree on simple, unobtrusive measures to combat it.
I understand the fears that new requirements will create additional burdens for eligible voters, but my bill takes pains to avoid this, permitting utility bills, government checks, pay stubs, and other forms of identification to be used in lieu of photo ID. Similarly, those who cannot produce any form of identification when they come to vote would be given the opportunity to cast a provisional ballot, which will be counted if they can later demonstrate their eligibility. Its a fair solution, I think, and its one that courts have routinely upheld and that the bipartisan Carter-Baker Commission, headed by former president Jimmy Carter and former secretary of state James Baker, have strongly endorsed.
Its also an idea that went down to defeat the other day, as SB 134 was passed by indefinitely on a 6-5 party line vote in committee. Given the evidence that a problem exists a Johns Hopkins University Study identified 1,500 deceased Marylanders who had voted in recent elections, one county in New Mexico found 75 registrants at a single address, and right here in Virginia, campaign headquarters, vacant lots, and non-existent addresses have all been listed on many registration forms its disappointing to see such a bill rejected.
Elsewhere, you may have read about the pending transfer of convicted murderer Jens Soering to Germany, a request approved by Tim Kaine during his final days in office. If youre not familiar with the case, Soering was convicted of the brutal murder of his girlfriends parents in 1985 and is currently serving two life sentences, with his girlfriend sentenced to ninety years as an accessory.
In one of his final acts as governor, Kaine filed the requisite paperwork to transfer Soering to Germany without consulting with or even notifying the victims families before the decision had been made where he is expected to be released after two years (and in no event held more than ten). The other day, I signed an open letter to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder penned by my colleague, Senator Steve Newman, urging him to deny the transfer.
Also, have you heard about the latest in green technology, the alternative energy clothes dryer that harnesses solar and wind power? Some of us grew up calling it a clothes line, but here in the General Assembly its a natural drying device, and its creating quite a stir.
No surprise, really. The newspapers get to trot out every possible groan-inducing pun, with one article in the Richmond Times-Dispatch alone saying the legislation stretch[ed] out the Senate and speculating that it would get blown away in the House, where the prevailing winds were against it, despite the fact that it breezed through the Senate.
So lets shine some sunlight on this thing, shall we? (Yes, Im doing it, too.) Clotheslines have been around forever, and they're a fine and cost-effective way to accomplish a routine household chore. At issue, though, was whether they should be permitted in communities with restrictive covenants despite ordinances to the contrary whether, in other words, someone who bought property with the understanding that certain restrictions were in place should have no say in a change in the terms of his agreement with the homeowners association because of a mandate handed down from Richmond.
I say no. There are few legitimate reasons for government to override private contracts or interfere with contractual property rights, and this is certainly not one of them. And its just one of the odd trifles that keep cropping up this session, even as we prepare to take on a far more pressing challenges.
Finally, this week afforded me an opportunity to meet with some friends and neighbors from the district, which is always one of the highlights of my weeks here in Richmond. Members of my local Chambers of Commerce, credit union employees, members of police and sheriffs offices across the district, and representatives of various local businesses, including from the hospitality and tourism industry, all stopped by, along with many other constituents. As always, I enjoy hearing from my constituents, so if youre in Richmond, feel free to stop by, and even if you cant do that, you can always pick up the phone and call my office at (804) 698-7526 or email me at mark@markobenshain.com
I look forward to hearing from you!
Mark Obenshain
Virginia State Senator
P.S. If you have not yet taken my constituent survey, please do so at www.markobenshain.com today!
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
A Winter Blast from the
Senate of Virginia
As a blanket of snow falls on the Commonwealth, I hope this email finds you warm, dry, and settling in for the weekend. The General Assembly did not convene today due to inclement weather across the Commonwealth, so I get to be snowed in with my family and neighbors in Harrisonburg for the weekend. Indeed, maybe I will still be snowed in and will be able to watch the Super Bowl at home in the Valley this year!
Those of you who have to venture out this weekend may want to check www.511virginia.org or to call 511 on your phone first to check road conditions and traffic updates.
Its been stormy at times here in the General Assembly, too, though Im pleased to report that this week saw some positive news as well.
The Senate passed SB 537, a bill to raise the speed limit on interstates from 65 to 70 mph, and the House is likely to follow suit. Presuming passage in the House, though, this law still wont go into effect until July 1, so dont try out the new speed limit just yet especially not in these conditions!
The Senate passed three bills (Senate Bills 283, 311, and 417) collectively known as the health care freedom bills, which state that Virginians cannot be required to purchase health insurance. We all know that health insurance is a good thing, of course, and expanding coverage is a goal everyone shares, but it is not the role of government to mandate purchases, so I was glad to join all eighteen Republicans and five Democrats in passing each of these bills on a vote of 23-17. You can watch video of the floor debate here.
We had quite a fight in the Senate Courts of Justice Committee on Wednesday when a coerced abortion bill patroned by my colleague Ralph Smith found its way onto the docket. The bill is a simple and sensible one, the sort of thing you would think should enjoy broad support, regardless of ones position on abortion. All the bill does is make it a misdemeanor offense to coerce a pregnant woman into having an abortion for instance, if a boyfriend physically threatens his pregnant girlfriend.
This isnt really about abortion; its about choice. Im proudly pro-life, but I dont even know what it means to be pro-choice if pro-choicers are okay with someone physically coercing someone to choose abortion, or too concerned about being seen as insufficiently rigid on the issue to vote for such a commonsense bill.
The bill, SB 504, actually received a favorable report in subcommittee thanks to Democratic Senator Roscoe Reynolds (D-Henry County), who supported the legislation. Once a bill is reported from subcommittee, it goes to the full committee for consideration or at least, thats what is supposed to happen. Instead, it mysteriously disappeared from the Courts Committee docket and showed up in the docket of the Committee on Education and Health, where the deck is stacked against any pro-life legislation. To be clear, it wasnt re-referred. There was no vote. It just reappeared there.
When the error was discovered by which I mean, when the patron and others made the breach of the Senate Rules an issue the bill returned to Courts, where the majority leader, Senator Saslaw (D-Fairfax), made a formal motion to refer the bill to Education and Health (to die). The subcommittee chair, Senator Reynolds, strongly opposed the motion as coming far too late in the process, but his vote together with those of the five Republicans remaining on the Committee proved inadequate to stop the bill from being referred to another committee where it will meet its all but certain demise.
The Family Foundation has more on the committee battle here, and you can even watch the video of the committee debate, if you wish.
Elsewhere, my bill to shift ½ penny of the sales tax to the Transportation Trust Fund (only to the extent that we experience tax revenue growth above 3%) died a swift death in the Senate Finance Committee. This would have moved $450 million into the transportation fund once our revenue grew by at least that much to meet our growing transportation needs. Unfortunately, this effort to dedicate a portion of future revenue growth to transportation is going nowhere as long as the Senate remains in Democratic hands.
We had some excitement on the floor this week, too. One bill, patroned by Senator George Barker (D-Fairfax), would make it a primary offense for the holder of a provisional driver's license to operate a motor vehicle while talking on a cell phone.
The problem, of course, is enforcement. Legislators who have long asserted civil rights concerns as reasons not to give law enforcement officers open-ended authority to stop motorists sat on their hands when the bill passed. This measure effectively gives police the right to stop anyone driving while talking on the cell phone if they simply look young. As you might expected, I voted no.
And of course, the budget issue still looms, and remains our top priority. Some Democrats have come to grips with the fact that the full reinstatement of the car tax is not a viable option, but many still cling to that tax-hiking hope, and have angrily taken to the floor to denounce Governor McDonnell and their colleagues in the General Assembly for working to find solutions that dont increase the burden on Virginias taxpayers in this difficult time.
As always, I enjoy hearing from my constituents, so I hope youll call my Richmond office at (804) 698-7526 or email me at mark@markobenshain.com if you have any comments, questions, or concerns during session, and I appreciate those who have come to visit me in the General Assembly Building as well. This week, students from Blue Ridge Community College, local nurses, and others braved the elements to stop by my office, and I enjoyed meeting with them.
Have a safe and warm weekend!
Mark Obenshain
Virginia State Senator
P.S. If you have not yet taken my constituent survey, please do so at www.markobenshain.com today!
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Article Content
RICHMONDToday, a bill (SB 443) introduced by Senator Mark Obenshain (R-Harrisonburg) designed to privatize Virginia's ABC stores was passed by indefinitely by the Senate Finance Committee to provide more time to work with the Governor to refine the proposal.
"I look forward to working with Governor McDonnell to develop legislation that divests the Commonwealth's liquor monopoly in a financially and socially responsible manner," said Obenshain.
"State liquor monopolies are a holdover from the early days after the repeal of Prohibition, a product of unrealized fears," Obenshain added. "We're still living in the shadow of Prohibition seventy-six years after repeal."
Virginia is one of eighteen "control" states, where both retail and wholesale operations fall completely under the purview of the state, a holdover from John D. Rockefeller's campaign for state control of liquor sales in an attempt to prevent "moral decay."
"We can achieve privatization in a socially responsible manner. We have three quarters of a century of evidence to show that control states do not fare any better than their non-control counterparts on underage drinking, driving under the influence, or alcoholism in fact, states with private liquor sales do better in these areas and still the Commonwealth refuses to release its grip on the sale of alcohol," said Obenshain.
"Divesting Virginia's ABC stores is a win-win situation," Obenshain explained. "Privatization offers consumers the benefits of competition: more convenient hours, wider selection, lower prices, and innovation, just to name a few. It does away with the more than $120 million the government spends each year on administrative costs while creating new revenue streams by auctioning off wholesale and retail licenses. And it gets the state out of something in which it never had any business getting involved."
Under Obenshain's proposal, package store licenses, which would authorize the retail sale of alcohol beverages, would be auctioned off one at a time, with no less than one license in every city and county, and the number of licenses tied to the population of the jurisdiction, adjusted every five years. The annual state license charge on package store licenses would be determined by auction, and would be inflation-adjusted.
"This is an idea whose time has come," said Obenshain. "Privatizing the ABC stores and using the revenue to help fund transportation is one of Governor McDonnell's priorities, and I look forward to working with the Governor to make this a reality."
Virginia is not alone in this effort; North Carolina, Washington, and Mississippi are currently weighing proposals to sell their distilled spirits monopolies to raise revenues, and many states divested their own operations in the 1990s. "As Governor McDonnell said in his State of the Commonwealth Address, selling Jack Daniel's is not a core function of government," said Obenshain.
Senator Obenshain represents the twenty-sixth district in the Virginia Senate. The district includes the city of Harrisonburg and the counties of Warren, Shenandoah, Page, Rappahannock and Rockingham (part).
ON THE WEB:
Mark'Â’s website: http://www.markobenshain.com
Mark'Â’s Facebook profile: http://www.facebook.com/markobenshain
Senate Bill 443: http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?101+sum+SB443
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Article Content
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Article Content
RICHMONDToday, Senator Mark Obenshain (R-Harrisonburg) expressed disappointment that, despite recent evidence of election fraud and abuses in large-scale voter registration drives, simple legislation requiring registration and online training for those managing uncommonly large registration drives was rejected on a near party-line vote in a Tuesday afternoon meeting of the Senate Committee on Privileges and Elections.
"In recent years, we have seen ample evidence that some of those involved in large-scale voter registration efforts are often either unfamiliar with or unwilling to follow election law," said Obenshain. "Most of those who participate in the political process believe in the system and work within it, but every election cycle, a few voter registration drives cross the line, submitting fraudulent registration forms or registering people who are ineligible to vote. Many others submit incomplete applications that must be amended later, something that could be addressed with simple training."
Obenshains bill (SB 690) would have required that voter registration drives submitting 1,000 or more voter applications must register with the State Board of Elections and fulfill the training requirements established by the Board.
"Voter registration fraud is a real and serious issue," said Obenshain. "Sorting through obviously fake registrations wastes time and resources, though its the less obvious ones, the ones that might get through, that we should really be concerned about."
In 2008, the registrar for the City of Richmond uncovered more than a hundred fake voter registrations containing transparently false names and addresses. Chesterfield County identified upwards of eighty fake registrations, with the registrar's office reporting that many names and addresses had been lifted from phone books and registered by those involved in voter registration drives. Elsewhere, four employees of the Community Voters Project, three in Hampton Roads and one in Norfolk in two separate cases, were arrested for voter registration fraud in 2008. Portsmouths Commonwealth Attorney called fraudulent registrations "off the charts" that year, and indictments were made in other localities as well.
Even in situations where there is clearly no malicious intent, voter registration drive coordinators may be unaware of Virginias election laws and thus unable to provide accurate information to registrants filling out their voter application forms. "A free and simple online training program would make a dent in the number of incomplete applications registrars receive every year, saving both registrars and would-be registrants time and effort."
"The State Board of Elections already has the training course in place and told the committee that they can offer it to voter registration drives, and maintain a database of such drives, using existing resources and at no additional cost," said Obenshain. "Given strong evidence of a problem and the availability of a simple, cost-free solution, I was dismayed by the partisan votes of some of my Democratic colleagues."
"The integrity of our election process should not be a partisan issue. Thats why I worked closely with the State Board of Elections on this bill that was introduced to address fraud and abuse identified by the Board," added Obenshain, who also patroned legislation that would have required voters to present some form of identification at the polls. That bill (SB 134) also died on a partisan vote.
"Republicans and Democrats had an opportunity to link arms and take a stand against election fraud and abuse on these two bills," said Obenshain. "Instead, Democrats chose to link arms with groups like ACORN and others linked to abusive practices."
Although Senator George Barker (D-Alexandria) voted for the voter registration drives bill, Democratic Senators Howell, Deeds, Whipple, Edwards, McEachin, Petersen, Northam, and Puckett, who introduced nearly identical legislation last session, voted against the legislation, killing it in the Senate Committee on Privileges and Elections.
"Given the opportunity to stand against the sort of election fraud and mischief we have seen emerge in recent years, the Democrats took a pass," said Obenshain. "Preventing voter fraud and cutting down on the number of applications that must be resubmitted each year should not be a partisan issue, and the decision of eight of the committees nine Democrats to vote against this commonsense bill is a disappointment," he said.
Senator Obenshain represents the twenty-sixth district in the Virginia Senate. The district includes the city of Harrisonburg and the counties of Warren, Shenandoah, Page, Rappahannock and Rockingham (part).
ON THE WEB:
Mark'Â’s website: http://www.markobenshain.com
Mark'Â’s Facebook profile: http://www.facebook.com/markobenshain
Senate Bill 690: http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?101+sum+SB690
# # #
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Article Content
In Richmond, a Blizzard of Bills
In Richmond these days, the only things falling faster than snow are axes falling on bills as we close in on crossover, the day by which all legislation must have been heard in its originating chamber.
To give you an idea of the barrage we're facing, the Senate has passed 297 bills thus far, and another 212 are dead. With just a few days to gocrossover is Tuesdayanother 523 are either still in committee or waiting to be heard on the floor.
This time of year, legislation is heard quickly, and often killed quickly. Controversial bills that have been bottled up for weeks are heard rapid-fire. At very least, the days before crossover are never dull, and there are always a few surprises in store.
Take, for instance, a number of gun bills that came before the Senate Courts of Justice Committee on Wednesday. Senate Democrats had kept the bills off the docket all session long, but on Wednesday, the committee chair relented and held hearings on the bills. To everyone's surprise for a committee with a 9-6 Democratic advantage, several good bills supported by gun owners reported out of committee.
Two in particular deserve mention: Senator Jill Vogel's SB 408, which allows those who may lawfully possess a handgun to transport it in a private motor vehicle if locked in a container or compartment, and Sen. Ralph Smith's SB 3, which allows applications for renewal of concealed carry permits to be submitted by mail, removing an unnecessary hassle for gun owners.
Also notable was the failure of SB 595, a bill to close the so-called "gun show loophole." Supporters of the Second Amendment recognize this bill as a transparent attempt to discourage handgun ownership by purporting to close a loophole that really does not exist. Democrats on the committee decided not to even take a formal vote on the bill, recognizing that they lacked the votes to pass it on a committee that overwhelmingly favors them.
As you might expect, with lagging revenues and the budget shortfall, we have heard a lot of talk about looming service cuts. Those supporting tax hikes have argued that if we do not accept new taxes and fees, we will have to cut essential services. (Some might suggest that they believe that all services are essential.) A common refrain on the floor has been that our budget will leave no money for sheriffs and law enforcement.
The articulated concerns are difficult to reconcile with the actions of some. One member of the Senate introduced a bill to allow felony drug offenders to collect TANF (welfare) benefits. That's right: some of those suggesting that cuts to law enforcement will be necessary actually want to make welfare payments to drug felons. I have long argued that our priorities are all wrong and that we need to treat education and law enforcement as the priorities they are instead of paying lip service to it.
Perhaps the most infuriating move this week, though, was the decision of Senate Democrats to kill Senator Frank Wagner's offshore drilling bill. Drilling fifty miles offshore is ecologically sound, fiscally prudent, and forward-looking. It is a vital component of an energy portfolio that helps decrease our nation's reliance on foreign oil, would bring jobs to the Commonwealth and generate royalties that would help fund transportation here in Virginia, and it is supported by our state's congressional delegation, including our two Democratic Senators, Jim Webb and Mark Warner. The bipartisan support for the measure sadly did not extend to the Senate of Virginia.
One of my bills, designed to divest the state's ABC stores, was passed by indefinitely in the Senate Finance Committee, at my request, to provide more time to work with the governor to refine the proposal. Virginia is one of eighteen states that maintain a liquor monopoly, and I think it's time we step out of the shadow of Prohibition and privatize the ABC stores in a financially and socially responsible manner. For those who support privatization, fear not. The effort is very much alive and is moving forward.
Divesting the state's ABC stores is not an easy task, and there are many components and issues to be addressed, but I will continue to work with the governor and I will return with a revised bill in a special or later session.
Finally, three of my bills passed earlier this week and a few others met their demise; all, however, shared a theme, inasmuch as they are reflections of the current state of our economy.
I've had a number of bills, plus a budget amendment, designed to free up education dollars and provide local school divisions with greater authority to spend the money as they see fit, to meet their highest priorities, not what the General Assembly thinks those priorities should be. These bills were requested and crafted in close consultation with several Shenandoah Valley school divisions.
As you might expect, the General Assembly did not relax its grip quite that easily. One bill, delaying adoption of new accreditation standards, did pass, but the others did not. Those other measures which would have freed up lottery funds (currently targeted to legislators' pet education projects in many cases) and money from the classroom size reduction fund and allowing schools to spend that money on their most urgent educational needs.
Another of my bills, SB 137, gives commissioners of the revenue and treasurers access to voter lists to provide commissioners of the revenue with the information necessary for them to identify those who should be paying taxes in their locality.
If we wish to keep the tax burden on Virginia's families and businesses as low as possible, it is critical for state and local governments to have the tools necessary to identify those who should be paying taxes, and this offers commissioners another tool to do so. Voter registration is not the only factor in assessing residency and it is not determinative, but it makes no sense to continue to deprive commissioners of the revenue of access to those records. The bill passed the Senate and is on its way to the House.
Several other bills I patroned also passed this week, including one designed to encourage homebuilding and another that fixes the unintended consequences, for some rural localities including Rockingham County, of some tax-related legislation that was enacted last year.
Finally, it was my privilege to meet with a number of individuals and groups from the district and from around the Commonwealth this week. I spoke with a group of pastors assembled for Pastors Day earlier this week; met with members of the Rockingham County Board of Supervisors and the New Market town council; and had the opportunity to speak with a few college students from Harrisonburg. Snow kept a few other groups away, but it's always a pleasure to meet with my constituents here in Richmond, and I look forward to those visits picking up again next week.
Mark Obenshain
Virginia State Senator
P.S. If you have not yet taken my constituent survey, please do so at www.markobenshain.com today!
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Article Content
RICHMOND--Today, Democrats on the Senate Courts of Justice Committee voted along party lines to defeat SB 7, Senator Mark Obenshain (R-Harrisonburg)'s legislation to close the "triggerman loophole." The bill would have reinstated accomplice liability for principals in the second degree and accomplices before the fact. Closing this loophole has been a priority of the law enforcement community for years, and passed both chambers with bipartisan support three consecutive years before meeting with then-Governor Tim Kaine's veto pen.
Senator Creigh Deeds (D-Bath), the Democratic nominee for governor in 2009, voted against the bill after consistently and vocally supporting it in previous years. "I think it is fair to ask whether Senator Deeds was sincere in his prior votes for closing the triggerman loophole or in today's vote against it," said Obenshain. "Back when he was running for Governor, Deeds touted his support for this bill as one of his credentials, but with the election behind him, he's singing a different tune."
Deeds, who voted for the legislation and in favor of overriding then-Gov. Kaine's vetoes each previous time the bill was introduced, was joined by Senators Marsh, Saslaw, Howell, Lucas, Edwards, Puller, Deeds, McEachin, and Petersen in rejecting the bill.
"Democrats stacked the Courts committee this year, and it shows," said Obenshain, who noted that in a narrowly divided 22-18 Senate, Democrats enjoy a 9-6 majority on the powerful Senate Courts of Justice Committee. "Today, they killed a good bill one that enjoyed bipartisan support from seven Senate Democrats and nineteen House Democrats last year," said Obenshain.
"This bill enjoys broad support among legislators, prosecutors, and law enforcement, all of whom see this legislation as necessary for the effective prosecution of those who willfully, deliberately, and intentionally participate in the commission of a capital murder, but happen not to be the individual pulling the trigger," said Obenshain, noting that the bill has been endorsed by the Virginia Crime Commission, the Virginia Association of Commonwealth's Attorneys, the Virginia Sheriffs' Association, and other law enforcement organizations, and enjoyed the support of all four major-party candidates for governor including all three Democratic contenders last year.
"Closing the triggerman loophole will increase public safety by restoring an important tool to prosecutors," he added.
The existing triggerman loophole allows criminal defendants who willfully and deliberately participated in a premeditated murder that is otherwise covered as a capital offense to escape prosecution for capital murder if they did not actually pull the trigger. It is a distinction unheard of in common law and unknown to Virginia law until 1979. The loophole was created at a time when the courts had called the constitutionality of the death penalty into question, and we are long overdue to close it.
"Under current Virginia law, even someone like Charles Manson could not be prosecuted for capital murder, despite the fact that he orchestrated the Tate-LaBianca murders in the 1960s," said Obenshain.
The majority of states with the death penalty make co-conspirators in capital murder cases eligible for the death penalty. Supporters of this change cite a number of especially aggravated murders where the existing triggerman rule has thwart prosecutors. In a particularly heinous crime in 1999, it was only possible to obtain a death sentence against one of three men who abducted, raped, and brutally murdered a woman.
A similar bill (HB 502) patroned by Del. Todd Gilbert (R-Woodstock), passed the House with broad bipartisan support, 74-24. "I hope that Democrats on the Senate Courts of Justice Committee will reconsider their vote when Todd's bill comes before them, and that Senator Deeds will revisit his newfound objections."
Although they have voted against the bill more recently, Senators John Edwards (D-Roanoke) and Majority Leader Dick Saslaw (D-Springfield) both supported the measure in 2007, when the Senate passed Obenshain's bill 28-11.
"When it comes to law enforcement, Virginians are looking for consistent leadership, not votes of convenience," said Obenshain. "I regret that this formerly bipartisan measure died at the hands of an increasingly partisan Democratic Senate majority."
Senator Obenshain represents the twenty-sixth district in the Virginia Senate. The district includes the city of Harrisonburg and the counties of Warren, Shenandoah, Page, Rappahannock and Rockingham (part).
ON THE WEB:
Mark'Â’s website: http://www.markobenshain.com
Mark's Facebook profile: http://www.facebook.com/markobenshain
Senate Bill 7: http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?101+sum+SB7
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Article Content
![]()
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Article Content
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Article Content
This week, all eyes turned toward the budget, which is now front and center, where it rightly belongs. It is the topic of nearly every conversation and the focus of every legislator. I wish I had better news, but the situation we face is dire and the cuts that are required will be deep.
The Commonwealth faces a $4.2 billion revenue shortfall, this coming on the heels of sizable reductions made over the past two years, and there are simply no good or painless ways to cover a shortfall of that magnitude. In recent days, you may have opened your newspaper to accounts of proposed cuts to education, health, and other government services, and I want to take a few minutes to talk about what you can expect.
My comments are not meant as criticism of the new administration nor of the Senate Finance Committee or the House Committee on Appropriations, which are charged with the difficult task of producing a balanced budget in trying times. The Governor, in particular, was presented with a thankless task, and anyone crafting a budget under these circumstances will produce a document with components that everyone dislikes.
The Governor has done a very good job under the worst possible circumstances, for which I am grateful. Of particular note, he has identified innovative ways to reduce the impact of cuts to local government, including a plan that may return up to $500 million to local government to be spent as localities see fit, including to help cover education expenditures.
I am, however, deeply concerned about some of the proposed cuts to K-12 education, which will, in some cases, reduce educational services, and in others, saddle local school divisions with standards they may no longer be adequately funded to meet. I patroned legislation to provide greater flexibility for school divisions to spend the state dollars that remain, and I am pleased to report that this is one of Governor McDonnells initiatives as well, but this alone cannot offset the severity of these cuts.
One area we have not examined is the Virginia Preschool Initiative, a new program which takes $150 million away from K-12 education each year. No one wants to cut preschool funding, but faced with stark choices between cutting math, science, and reading instruction or rolling back a newly-implemented preschool initiative, the former may be the unfortunate, but sadly necessary, choice, and it is a discussion the General Assembly must have.
Also before the General Assembly is a proposal to restructure some payments into the Virginia Retirement System, which manages the pensions for teachers and state employees. The proposal is not to reduce benefits, but rather to temporarily reduce the rate at which we make payments against the plans of currently active employees, money we will have to make up that we would essentially owe to ourselves when the economy rebounds.
The goal is to free up $1.1 billion over the biennium. Of that sum, $500 million could be redirected to localities to help offset reductions in state aid for public education. It is vitally important, however, that this proposal be vetted thoroughly to ensure that any temporary changes to how we pay into these plans (technically, how we contribute toward projected future liabilities) does not undermine the structural integrity of the system or jeopardize our obligations to retirees. Further analysis is necessary, and I will be watching this matter very closely before I decide how to vote on these proposals.
Social services are also taking a serious hit, and I am particularly concerned about the elimination of consumer-directed care for the elderly and those with both physical and mental disabilities. Consumer-directed care consists of waivers for community-based care that allows the individual to live independently or with family, and to receive in-home assistance or to cover some of the costs for a family member to care for the affected person.
Although community-based care is not always possible, we should be encouraging it wherever we can, as it is far better for the interests of the elderly or disabled individual and it is considerably more cost-effective than institutional care or commitment to a nursing home. I am deeply concerned about the proposed elimination of community-based care in favor of moving everyone toward agency-directed care, and will continue to raise my concerns with the Governor and my colleagues in the General Assembly.
There are many other valid concerns, ranging from funding levels for law enforcement and emergency medical service providers to possible cuts to the Tuition Assistance Grant program that helps students enroll at a private college or university in the Commonwealth. We cannot avoid painful cuts, but I am committed to working to ensure that the cuts we do make are responsible ones.
I believe that we can balance the budget without raising taxes. In fact, I believe we must: adding further roadblocks to economic growth would only hinder recovery, and in the long run, economic growth is the only way out of the budget crunch. There is a growing bipartisan consensus on the inadvisability of increasing the tax burden on the hard-working people of Virginia.
The belief that we can and indeed must cut spending to balance the budget, however, does not imply the further belief that every cut is appropriate, or that every department, agency, or program can absorb a similar reduction level.
We do have an opportunity before us an opportunity to really reform government, to reconsider how we provide many services, and even whether we should be providing some of them. Governor McDonnell is convening a commission on government reform, and I only wish we had the time to hear back from the commission before finalizing a budget. A good budget is not made piecemeal, nor is it constructed by taking a machete to everything; it requires careful if, in this case, heavy pruning.
It is absolutely imperative that we scour state government for opportunities to eliminate wasteful programs, a search whose scope should include serious deliberation about eliminating entire agencies in some cases. My preference would be to have already started on this process so that we could incorporate findings into the budget now being crafted, but even if not available for this year, we must conduct this review sooner rather than later, using the savings for the prompt restoration of lost funding for critical programs.
Transportation and public safety, which took the brunt of the reductions made during the past budget cycle, have been spared further major cuts, but you may have concerns about other reductions that have not been addressed here, and I would encourage you to reply to this email with your thoughts and concerns if you wish to discuss a budgetary issue I have not touched upon here.
The next phase comes this Sunday, when there will be special meetings of the Senate Finance Committee and the House Appropriations Committee to present the budgets they have been developing over the past few weeks, which should provide greater clarity as to the proposals under consideration and underscore areas where the House, Senate, and Governor may be in disagreement, so that these differences can be addressed and worked out in the days that follow.
I recognize that, with this update, I am a bearer of bad news, and it would certainly be my preference to be able to provide you with a more cheerful outlook. It is my responsibility, however, to provide you with the bad news along with the good, and to lay out the issues were grappling with right now. There may be no good options, but some are better than others, and I will do everything within my power to ensure that the budget adopted is a responsible one not a painless one, and certainly not one that everyone will love, but one that recognizes our commitments and charts a course for recovery.
Passing a responsible, equitable, and forward-looking budget is my top priority, and I wanted to take this opportunity to share with you some of what were considering. Please feel free to forward this to any friends or colleagues who may be interested in reading this update, and I hope that you will not hesitate to contact me with any ideas, questions, or concerns you may have.
Mark Obenshain
Virginia State Senator
P.S. If you have not yet taken my constituent survey, please do so at www.markobenshain.com today!
Article Content
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Article Content
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Article Content
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Two Obenshain Bills Easing Burden on Local
School Divisions Head to Governors Desk
Bills Will Allow Schools to Focus
on Their Most Urgent Priorities
RICHMOND--Today, the Virginia House of Delegates lent their unanimous support to two bills patroned by Senator Mark Obenshain (R-Harrisonburg), both designed to provide greater flexibility to local school divisions and lift costly mandates at a time when school divisions are being asked to do more with less. The bills, Senate Bills 352 and 354, now head to the Governor for his signature. A budget amendment Obenshain proposed is also reflected in the budget amendments adopted by the House and Senate money committees, and in the Governor's recommendations.
"Although the General Assembly is working to make cuts as modest as possible, the reality is that public education will not be spared in the 2010 budget," said Obenshain. "My bills will help free up funding for local education priorities by lifting expensive state mandates and providing greater flexibility in the use of state aid."
The first bill, SB 352, delays the adoption of accreditation standards for one year to grant local school divisions a reprieve from a costly transition during a period in which those schools face funding reductions.
"Schools cannot afford to create new programs at a time when they are struggling to maintain their current educational offerings," said Obenshain. "Superintendents and school board members in my district have consistently emphasized the importance of dedicating their resources to maintaining their existing programs, and have expressed concern about the cost of implementing new standards this coming academic year. A one year reprieve will offer an opportunity for the economy to catch up."
The legislation makes no changes to Standards of Learning, Standards of Quality, or similar educational standards, merely delaying implementation of revised standards by one year, after which accreditation standards will proceed on schedule. "This is about giving schools a breather so that the state is not asking them to expand programming while funding dips," said Obenshain, "and I am pleased that the House concurred with the bill."
The second bill, SB 354, deals with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) testing. "Schools are required to administer Limited English Proficiency tests to determine instructional placement," Obenshain explained. In recent years, Virginia has used a single test, the ACCESS test, on an exclusive basis, even though the LEP is principally for internal use by local school divisions, rendering standardization across divisions unnecessary.
"Arlington and Fairfax have developed their own proficiency tests, and there are a variety of competing commercially available tests as well," said Obenshain. "Granting local school divisions the ability to select or develop their own qualifying test, should they so choose, allows for the inclusion of local considerations and could save local school divisions the $27 per student spent on administering the ACCESS test."
"Not every test is equally suited to measuring progress in every school environment, and the law should reflect that reality," added Obenshain. "I was pleased to see that the House and Senate concurred, with both chambers passing the bill unanimously."
Senate Bills 352 and 354 now head to the Governor for his signature.
Senator Obenshain represents the twenty-sixth district in the Virginia Senate. The district includes the city of Harrisonburg and the counties of Warren, Shenandoah, Page, Rappahannock and Rockingham (part).
ON THE WEB:
Mark'Â’s website: http://www.markobenshain.com
Mark's Facebook profile: http://www.facebook.com/markobenshain
Senate Bill 352: http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?101+sum+SB352
Senate Bill 354: http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?101+sum+SB354
Article Content
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
My Votes on the Budget
and Senate Leadership Playing Games
About two weeks ago, the Democratic leadership of the Senate of Virginia decided that bills could die in subcommittee. The Rules of the Senate had not been amended, and no new interpretation was advanced: it's just the way things are going to be.
They killed a dozen bills in that meeting, denying the full committee the opportunity to vote on them, as has always been the Senate's policy (subcommittees make recommendations, but, until now, never had the power to kill a bill). These weren't off the wall bills, either. Every one of them passed the House with bipartisan majorities and at least sixty-one votes. Eleven had seventy or more votes, five had 87+ votes, and three actually passed the House unanimously. Yet these bills were evidently too much for the special subcommittee, which decided not to let them see the light of day. Stay tuned on this issue.
This new hardball tactic, which may be inconsistent with the Senate Rules, has garnered a lot of attention of late, and rightly so, but the budget remains everyone's top concern.
Last week, I joined nine other Senators in voting against the Senate Budget. I would like to take a few moments of your time to explain the reasons for those votes.
I imagine that most are aware of some of the ways the budget impacts education, health, and essential services, and my colleagues and I have been working hard to keep these cuts to a minimum and to restore funding to essential programs wherever possible. I outlined many of these concerns in my last email, and will not reiterate them all here, but I will note a few areas where improvements have been made since that time.
Two Sundays ago, the two money committees met in succession to consider and adopt the budget amendments recommended by their subcommittees, and the budget bills, with those amendments, went before their respective chambers.
The Senate passed a budget last week albeit without my vote and sent it to the House. The House, meanwhile, sent us their budget bill. Since there were inevitably significant differences between the two budgets, the budget bill then went to conference, where conferees from both chambers meet to produce a bill sent to an up-or-down (yes or no) vote in both chambers. The Senate's conferees are guided, in part, by the Senate Budget and floor action on the House budget as well as any concerns or priorities they bring to the process individually. The conferees began to meet in earnest this past Thursday.
It is certainly my hope that I will be able to vote for the budget before me at that time, but as I mentioned earlier in this email, I voted against the Senate Budget a week and I do want to provide you with the reasons for that decision.
Both chambers were confronted with very difficult choices, and I appreciate the hard work of the Senate Finance Committee, but I believe that, on the whole, the House Appropriations Committee reported a better budget one that rejects new or increased fees, in contrast to the Senate budget, which contains in excess of $320 million in new fees, and perhaps far more, since a number of sizable fee increases do not yet have a revenue estimate.
It's a long list, with new or higher fees for vehicle registration, telephones (both cellular and land lines), court appearances, hotel amenities, drivers' license reinstatement, college courses, property and casualty insurance, wells and sewage systems, access to various records, marriage licenses, wine, and more. Sometimes it seems as if government is on an unending quest to tax every element of our lives, and the Senate budget bill does little to dispel this notion.
In addition to its reliance upon new and increased fees, the Senate budget relies heavily upon the time tested (unsuccessfully of late) strategy of inflating certain revenue estimates. In this instance, there are about $200 million of highly questionable projected revenue increases. Included in these projected revenues are increases in tobacco tax receipts and ABC profits and fewer claimed conservation tax credits. To call these projections optimistic is being kind. First, tobacco use is on a downswing and taxes have not been increased, so the estimated increase in tobacco tax revenue is a total mystery. Second, since ABC stores are now allowed to stay open 7 days a week in several jurisdictions, increased profits have been projected. Skeptics might suggest that the market for spirits will remain the same, but the sales will be spread across 7 days rather than 6 (not to mention the increased operational expenses). Third and finally, no explanation whatsoever was attached by budget writers to the anticipated windfall flowing from their belief that in each of the next two years landowners will claim $50 million less in land conservation tax credits if they are in error, that's a $100 million hole in the budget.
Add to that an attempt to undermine the abolition of parole through the budget process and I have some real reservations about the Senate Budget. Still worse, the Senate Budget is far more reliant than its House counterpart on the assumption the hope, really that the state will receive a six month extension of enhanced Medicaid funding from the federal government, which is by no means a given. Both budgets make provision for the extra funding, but the Senate Budget is somewhat more free in dedicating the funding to essential programs. The House makes this money available for a second tier of priorities: if we get it, great, and if not, we'll manage. With the Senate Budget, however, we're in a far greater rut if those dollars fail to come through.
Both the House and Senate budgets made significant improvement to public education and health funding over what had been discussed in recent weeks, covered in part by additional federal funding for which Virginia qualified this past Thursday, and in larger part by a proposal by Governor McDonnell that adjust how and when the Commonwealth funds certain future pension liabilities, without changing actual compensation for existing state and local employees one iota.
I have been pleased to see significant progress made in these areas, with both budgets backfilling some of the previously planned cuts to local education and restoring Medicaid waivers for community-directed care. These community-based waivers provide a valuable alternative to institutional care for the elderly and those with disabilities a situation that favors the elderly and those with disabilities, their families, and the taxpayers, as community-based care is significantly more cost-effective than institutional care.
Neither budget, unfortunately, reflected the sort of systematic review that I would prefer, though time constraints made a more thorough examination difficult. Nevertheless, it is vitally important that, as soon as we have the budget process and this session behind us, we pour our efforts into reviewing our budget priorities. Governor McDonnell plans to convene a government reform commission, and it is my hope that they will approach the entirety of Virginia's budget with detail and an eye to serious reform, not just cuts.
The House budget came closer to the sort of structural reform we need than did the Senate budget, and the Governor made several very good proposals on this count, but each budget proposal fell short of the sort of reform that Virginia's long-term fiscal health will require.
I certainly do not favor all the budget amendments within the House bill, any more than I would endorse all provisions of the Senate bill. I am concerned about reductions and consolidation in the cooperative extension program, which is so important to agricultural communities, and the House bill makes a number of cuts to education that I would prefer to offset elsewhere.
What finally emerges will of necessity be a compromise between competing proposals, but sometimes compromise can be a good thing, and I look forward to carefully reviewing the budget that emerges from conference committee in the coming days. For the present, I voted against the Senate Budget given my concern about new fees this budget would impose on Virginia taxpayers and to express my reservations about a number of other provisions in the bill.
It is my hope that the conferees will return with a fiscally responsible budget that I will be able to support. I will continue to keep you apprised of further action on the budget.
Mark Obenshain
Virginia State Senator
P.S. If you have not yet taken my constituent survey, please do so at www.markobenshain.com today!
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Article Content
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Budgeting is Not Reform:
Storm Clouds Remain on the Horizon
While we await word from the budget conferees working on a patchwork plan for state spending over the next two years, it seems an opportune time to comment on what they will not accomplish. This budget will plug the holes in the dike. It will not usher in any fundamental governmental reform. There are important reminders of the hard work ahead.
For those banking on a quick economic recovery to solve our budget woes, February brought a grim revenue report. Every month the Secretary of Finance reports on the revenues of the previous month and he offers helpful insight as to how those figures affect trends. Sadly, the Commonwealth posted its worst month for revenue collection since March 1998, according to the revenue letter issued by the Secretary of Finance yesterday.
Of course, the winter weather had something to do with it: one must inescapably conclude that this winters prodigious snowfall has taken a toll on economic activity. To attribute too much significance to the effect of the snowfall on the figures would be a serious mistake. February was an anomaly in the degree by which revenues fell, not in the direction revenues have been trending. The unfortunate reality is that each month has been a little worse than the last -- revenue hasn't bottomed out quite yet.
Over the past two years, I have been critical of the revenue projections used by the prior administration to justify maintaining funding levels for programs favored by the Governor and postpone the day of reckoning until a new administration arrived. I applaud Governor McDonnell on recognizing and seeking to work within fiscal realities, but I still have doubts about the projections under which the budget writers are currently operating.
Going into conference, both the House and Senate assumed relatively modest growth in the coming fiscal year, 3.4 and 4.4% growth respectively, most of the difference between the two revenue models the result of taxes and fees included in the Senate budget that do not exist in the House budget. (The House budget does not increase the tax burden, so its growth projections are a better reflection of the impact of anticipated economic growth.)
Unfortunately, projections are not nearly as restrained in the second year of the biennium, with the House banking on nearly 8.5% revenue growth and the Senate anticipating 9.7% growth. Did you get that? I'll say it again -- we are projecting that Virginia's tax revenues will grow by almost 10% in the second year of the biennium.
I sincerely hope that the budget writers are right. A return to such economic vitality is long overdue at this point, and our citizens desperately need the economy to turn the corner. My concern, however, is that the budget is assuming high revenues in the second year, where projections are murky anyway, to make the budget "balance." The problem is that once you spend the outlays for the first fiscal year, if the second fails to live up to its billing, the Commonwealth will find itself in an even deeper hole than before.
Back to the revenue report -- general fund revenues fell 5.9% in February and are down 4.8% fiscal year to date (July 2009 through the present). Revenue collection is down considerably in every category: income tax withholding is down 6% year to date and sales tax collections are down 3.6% December through February (which includes holiday spending). In a glimmer of good news, corporate income tax collections rose substantially, but they only constitute six percent of general fund revenues, so the impact of this increase is limited.
Under the mid-session revised forecast, general fund revenues are expected to fall 2% in fiscal year 2010. With four months to go, we're down 4.8%, and while significant revenue months still lie ahead, the fact remains that each month has been worse than its counterpart last year and that was not a good year either. The downward spiral might have slowed (I certainly hope it has), but it's not clear that revenue collections have yet bottomed out, and it's far from clear that we will be realizing nine percent growth by FY 2012.
All of this underscores the importance of undertaking serious structural reform. For too long, we've waited to act until our backs were to the wall, forcing us to make spending cuts more indiscriminately than we would like. Governor McDonnell intends to convene a government reform commission, and I consider this an important step in the right direction. The work does not end once we vote on a budget; we must immediately set ourselves to the task of evaluating governmental priorities and how we deliver upon them.
The February revenue letter from the Secretary of Finance sounds an important cautionary note. I just hope we're listening.
Mark Obenshain
Virginia State Senator
P.S. If you have not yet taken my constituent survey, please do so at www.markobenshain.com today!
Article Content
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Article Content
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Article Content
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Session Recap Part 1:
The Budget
Well, it's over. After two months of wrangling, the Virginia General Assembly acted on the few bills that remained, passed a budget, and adjourned sine die. And I have to say, it’s good to be back in Harrisonburg – catching up with my family and with my law practice.
Now that we’re out, I do want to brief you on the budget vote and review some of the highlights – as well as the low points – of the past two months.
It was a bumpy ride, but it is a real honor to represent the people of the 26th district in the Senate of Virginia, and that is a charge I do not take lightly. As always, many friends and constituents made the trek to Richmond to visit during session. It’s always a pleasure to meet with constituents and friends from around the Commonwealth, and I am grateful for the dedication of those who made the trip to speak on behalf of a cause important to them.
At the end of session, my updates tend to run long, so I'll be breaking this up into three parts. Today I’ll take up the one issue that I know is on everyone’s mind, the budget the General Assembly just passed. In the coming days, I'll recap my own legislation and review some of the other critical bills and moments of session.
For now, the budget. As you probably know, the General Assembly reconvened on Sunday afternoon, one day after session was supposed to end, to pass a $70+ billion biennial budget (the precise size of the budget remains uncertain, contingent upon the amount of federal funds that flow to the Commonwealth).
After listening to Sunday’s Senate Finance Committee presentation on the final budget reported by the conferees, I decided to vote against the budget, but it wasn’t an easy decision. This isn’t the budget I wanted, but it’s also a far better budget than many expected. It includes some fee increases that I do not believe justifiable, makes cuts I would have preferred not to make, and neglects to make some cuts that I believe would have freed up money for more important priorities. Perhaps most importantly, I regret that this budget does not include the sort of structural reforms I consider necessary to put the Commonwealth on the right track going forward.
But there’s this: at the start of session, my colleagues on the other side of the aisle were calling for upwards of $2 billion in new taxes and fees. The final count was $95 million. And when we started out, we were looking at cutting a billion dollars from K-12 education; we ultimately cut a quarter of that – actually coming in far better than the introduced budget – and mitigate even these cuts. There was talk of freezing enrollment in children’s health insurance; didn’t happen. Health services generally looked poised to take a crushing blow, while we can now hold out hope that, if the federal government extends the Medicaid enhancement, we will be able to restore must cuts. I do, however, remain concerned about the projections upon which this budget has been built, as most observers believe that the 4 and 5.5% growth anticipated in the two years of the biennium is excessively optimistic.
No, this isn’t the budget I wanted, and I voted no because I think we could have done better, but still, my hat is off to the budget conferees, especially our area’s own Del. Steve Landes, as they did a good job under extremely difficult circumstances.
None of which means, of course, that it’s the budget any of us would like to have. With cuts of $11 billion since 2007, including nearly $4 billion in reductions for this coming biennium, no department or agency was entirely spared, but budget writers worked hard to limit cuts to essential services like education and health. We’ll review a few broad budget areas in detail:
K-12 Education
As property values have declined in recent years, the composite index based on which state aid to public education is disbursed has changed dramatically, with lower assessed values in Northern Virginia, in particular, which would have resulted in a dramatic shift of funds away from school districts elsewhere in the state at a time where this loss would have been exceedingly difficult to absorb. In response, the General Assembly adopted hold harmless grant allocations for the biennium – supplemental funding to keep our school funding where it would have been absent this change for the first year, and to make up 50% of the difference for school districts adversely affected by rebenchmarking (that is, updating the index) in FY 2012, for a total of $174 million in "hold harmless" allocations.
Technology grants, eliminated in Kaine’s introduced budget, have been restored, and non-essential programs have been eliminated from the lottery fund to make room for more important programs, like remedial summer school, ESL, and textbook funding, all of which will be funded in whole or in part by lottery monies this biennium. In the past, the lottery fund, while set aside for education, has become cluttered with dozens of pet projects – not all bad, by any means, but not top priorities at this juncture, either. By stripping those out, we are able to free up a significant revenue pool for far more essential educational expenditures.
The budget does cut about $250 million from K-12 education over the biennium – a far cry from the roughly $1 billion in cuts that were on the table at one point – but seeks to mitigate the impact by providing greater local flexibility on spending priorities and allowing school divisions to realize approximately $200 million in savings of their own based on technical adjustments to how VRS pension plans are funded for the biennium.
The details of this move are too complex to go into here, and I do have some concerns about this decision, but please note that this policy change is a temporary adjustment of the rate at which state and local governments pay into the pool, which will be made up later, and will not cut into the benefits of any current employees. It is, however, possible that some teachers and administrators may be required by their localities to contribute a portion of the VRS employee contribution, though I hope that school divisions will find alternatives to adopting this measure.
Since 1983, the Commonwealth of Virginia and many of its localities have paid both the employer and employee contributions for the defined benefits plans of state and local employees. It is not an ideal model, but it has been an accepted part of the compensation package for so long that any change is understandably viewed as a pay cut.
Greater flexibility, on the other hand, is a positive change under any circumstances. I carried several bills and a budget amendment on this issue, and I am pleased to report that the budget writers concurred with these proposals, taking state education dollars previously earmarked for particular programs that may or may not be suited to a school divisions needs and converting the money into block grants that schools can spend on their top priorities.
Health and Human Resources
Funding levels for health services remain something of a question mark as we wait to find out whether Congress will extend enhanced federal Medicaid assistance funding by six months. The budget contains contingent language that almost completely restores all funding to health services should the federal government provide this relief. If, however, it does not come through, some difficult cuts are forthcoming. An attempt has been made to reserve the deepest cuts for the second year of the biennium in hopes that, even absent the receipt of additional funding, more revenue might be available to patch some of these holes.
In a few glimmers of good news on this front, the budget that passed on Sunday does restore some cuts proposed in the introduced budget, restoring eligibility for long-term care and elderly and disabled home and community-based care Medicaid waivers and adding 250 new intellectually disabled waiver slots, and adding back funding for free clinics. In our region, funding was restored for the Commonwealth Center for Children and Adolescents in Staunton, which was slated to close. Finally, the cuts to FAMIS and Medicaid, though quite substantial, are still smaller than originally proposed, and will be restored if Congress passes the extension.
Public Safety and Constitutional Officers
The introduced budget gashed funding for sheriffs and constitutional officers – commonwealth’s attorneys, commissioners of the revenue, treasurers, and circuit court clerks among them. In some cases, the vast majority of state funding was eliminated. Recognizing that this would pose a nearly insurmountable challenge for localities, the General Assembly restored the vast majority of these cuts, with commonwealth’s attorneys and clerks of court funded at 96% and 99% of prior levels, respectively, and commissioners of the revenue and treasurers both above 81%.
The introduced budget would have reduced funding for sheriffs and regional jails by $106.9 million over the biennium. The final budget restores all but $8.3 million of these cuts and restores proposed cuts to the state police, eliminating the need to upwardly adjust the 1:1,500 law enforcement ratio we maintain in Virginia and providing the funding necessary to keep our communities safe.
Economic Development
Although I have concerns about the return on investment Virginia will receive in some of these areas, I share the commitment of the Governor and the General Assembly to ensure that the Commonwealth promotes economic development and keeps Virginia among the best states in which to do business, as the only way to keep every budget process from being this difficult is for the Commonwealth to experience substantial economic growth.
The final budget includes nearly all of Governor McDonnell’s Economic Development Promotion Package, nearly $44 million in all, to promote job creation, tourism, and international opportunities for Virginia businesses. These proposals also seek to position Virginia at the vanguard of research and development in bioscience and renewable energy production. Of considerable local interest, the state will keep its commitment to SRI, which recently established a cutting-edge research facility in Rockingham County.
Other Budget Areas
There are too many other adjustments to go into great detail into many, but allow me to share a few significant elements:
Fee Increases
The final budget includes $95.4 million in new or increased fees, a number that I believe to be too high, but is nothing like the $330 million in fee increases that were in the Senate budget or the $2 billion in tax and fee increases that many of my Democratic colleagues wanted.
As strange as this may sound coming from me, some of these fee increases are quite easily justified. Some are fees for service, with the fee schedule adopted decades ago. Costs have since outstripped the fees, turning them into a sort of subsidy. I have no objection to adjusting these fees to reflect present-day costs, and voted for a number of bills to do just that. Other fee increases, unfortunately, come with no such justification.
Among the new or increased fees (some of which I do believe are justifiable): the $4 for Life fee has been increased to $6.25 (it will now be called $6 for Life); environmental health services and DEQ environmental fees are up; there’s a significant increase in the driver’s license reinstatement fee; the deed recordation fee has increased by $10; food inspection fees have increased; and the dealer discount has been modified; among others changes. A massive ($101 million) fee increase on court filings was largely scrapped, and a 24% phone line fee hike – with revenues diverted to programs entirely unrelated to the 911 call centers the fee is meant to fund – was rejected as well.
Final Thoughts
Unfortunately, the budget does not include the substantial structural reforms for which many of us have hoped, but I know that this is one of Governor McDonnell’s priorities and I look forward to working with him to effect meaningful, long-term structural reform. Without this type of structural reform, these budget cuts will be like letting air out of a balloon – when the economy rebounds, it will just be filled right back up. We really need to change the size, shape and dimensions of government in Virginia, returning our focus to the tasks that government really should be performing and scrapping or overhauling others. We should not be just looking for ways to squeeze a few dollars out of each department or agency. Instead, we must ask more fundamental questions: why does the state perform this function? Could private industry do it better? Could we do it differently? Should we do it at all?
This is no easy task, nor is it accomplished in a day, a term, or perhaps even a political career, but it is the task to which we must set ourselves, to which I have committed myself.
I will be sharing some of my ideas, and soliciting yours, in the coming weeks. For now, thank you for reading, and thank you all for the thoughts, suggestions, concerns, objections, and words of encouragement I received during session.
Mark Obenshain
Virginia State Senator
P.S. With session behind us, I can now accept contributions again. I spent a significant part of my reserve helping our winning ticket this last cycle and need to replenish my own coffers. If these updates are helpful to you, and if you support my efforts to enact conservative reform in the Commonwealth, I hope that you will consider chipping in a few dollars
Article Content
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Article Content
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Article Content
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Health Care, My Bills, and
a Blueprint for Reform
Although I write primarily to recap some of my own legislation from the recently concluded 2010 session of the Virginia General Assembly and offer a blueprint for reform going forward, the big news of the week is, of course, the passage of the health care bill, and while I do not intend to dwell on that issue here, I would be remiss if I neglected it altogether. Democrats are jubilant, but the American people have good cause for alarm at the government takeover of this significant sector of the economy.
No one contends that our current health care reform is unnecessary, but government takeover is not reform. Moreover, it is imprudent, at best, to add an enormous entitlement program at a time when massive debt is required to fund the ones we already have. To help make the program "balance," the health care bill places an enormous new burden on the states starting in a few years. And you thought this year's budget process was painful...
Here in Virginia, Tom Perriello, Gerry Connolly, Bobby Scott, and Jim Moran voted for ObamaCare, and I'm sure the voters of Virginia, the majority of whom adamantly opposed this bill, will hold them to account at the polls on Election Day.
After that digression, let's get back to the subject of this email. Although I updated you on portions of my legislative package throughout session, I would like to quickly recap my bills.
Legislative Successes
I am pleased to report that eleven of my bills are on the Governor's desk, and while a number of others were bottled up in the Democrat-controlled Senate, I look forward to reintroducing many of them at a later date. First, some legislative successes from this past session.
Public Education
Although cuts to public education were minimized in the final budget, they remain very real, so mitigating the impact of any such cuts was among my top priorities this session. I patroned several bills designed to ease the burden on school systems by relaxing unnecessary mandates and providing school divisions with greater flexibility in spending the state funding they do receive.
Two of my bills, Senate Bills 352 and 354, delayed the adoption of new accreditation standards and allow school divisions to administer locally-selected Limited English Proficiency (LEP) assessment tests, respectively. The former gives schools an additional year's reprieve from the expense of adopting new standards at a time when funds are scarce, and the latter allows schools to choose from a variety of available, qualifying LEP tests (or to develop their own), which may be better suited to a particular locality and is often much more cost-effective. Both bills passed unanimously and will be signed into law by Governor McDonnell.
I also introduced a budget amendment to convert lottery funds into an education block grant. Currently, lottery funds are used for a panoply of education-related programs, some legitimate, others some legislator's pet project. Converting the funding into block grants would allow local school divisions to put the money toward their own top priorities. Unfortunately, this amendment didn't make the final budget, but the conferees did choose to pare down the list of programs, putting the money toward some more urgent needs.
Taxes and Local Government Issues
At the request of Rockingham County, I carried SB 355, a bill that clarifies rental property taxation issues, eliminating potential double taxation by some localities and allowing counties like Rockingham to exempt businesses with small-scale rental operations (for instance, a grocer that rents a few DVDs).
I also patroned SB 137, a bill that provides commissioners of revenue with access to voter rolls for use as one tool among many in determining residency for tax purposes. Active voter registration status alone is not sufficient grounds to declare an individual to have taken up residence in a given locality, but it certainly ought to be considered a factor in that determination.
Also on the local government front, I introduced SB 632, a technical bill that modifies the window of time in which developers owe proffers to a locality. Although not, perhaps, a very exciting bill, it is designed to help encourage economic growth and development. All three bills passed both chambers with overwhelming support and await action by the Governor.
Melendez Bills
Last year, the Supreme Court, in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, ruled that the right to confront one's accuser means that a defendant must be able to question a lab tech who analyzes blood work, conducts drug testing, or the like. In the past, what is known as a "certificate of analysis" had been sufficient.
The General Assembly convened in special session last year to address issues created by the Supreme Court's ruling, creating a framework by which certificates of analysis remain adequate provided that the defendant waives the right to cross-examine the technician or analyst, and providing for the use of video conferencing to allow techs to testify remotely in many cases.
This session, I worked closely with the Attorney General's office in carrying three bills – Senate Bills 385, 386, and 387 – that tied up a few loose ends from the special session.
Courts Bills
This session, I carried several bills that were recommendations of the Boyd-Graves Conference, a nonpartisan panel of litigators from across Virginia whose purpose is to improve Virginia's civil litigation process. I am a member of the Conference and have carried many of its bills over the past seven years. Senate Bills 382, 383, and 384 emerged from the Boyd-Graves conference; any attorneys reading this (and those in need of a sleep aid) may wish to review these bills, all of which passed.
Blueprint for Reform
Although a number of other bills met their demise in the Democrat-controlled Senate, I believe a number of them to be an important part of any reform agenda. Allow me to highlight five proposals I consider key to any comprehensive blueprint for reform:
Reforming State Procurement Practices
Current Policy: Virginia's Small, Woman-, and Minority-Owned (SWaM) Businesses set-aside program is one of the most aggressive in the nation, with a 40% procurement target and many requests for proposals (RFPs) sent exclusively to SWaM-qualified vendors, an anti-competitive measure that curtails competition and imposes higher procurement costs that spread our tax dollars thin.
My Proposal: Open bidding to all vendors, creating transparency on what contracting with SWaM vendors may cost above the qualified low bid, while continuing to allow agencies to enter into SWaM-preferred contracts at their discretion provided total project costs are not inflated by more than 3% above low qualifying bids (SB 691). This would, in essence, cap the price that we are willing to pay for these preferences – right now, we have preferences, but we have no idea how much they are costing Virginia's taxpayers.
Divesting the ABC Stores
Current Policy: The state maintains a retail and wholesale liquor monopoly, a holdover from the early days after Prohibition which restricts competition and consumer choice.
My Proposal: Divest or privatize the Commonwealth's distilled spirits monopoly by auctioning off package store licenses authorizing the retail sale of alcohol beverages. The auctions would be allocated on the basis of population and the price of the licenses would be adjusted every five years. The new revenue could, as Governor McDonnell has proposed, be dedicated to transportation improvements (SB 443).
Protecting Private Property
Current Policy: Although Virginia enacted strong statutory protections in 2007 in response to the Kelo case, there have been continued efforts to chip away at or circumvent these provisions.
My Proposal: Enshrining eminent domain reform in the Constitution of Virginia by means of an amendment narrowly defining the term "public uses" and establishing that property may not be taken if the primary purpose of the taking is private financial gain or benefit, an increase in tax revenues, or an increase in employment, and that no more property shall be taken than is necessary to achieve the stated public use (SJ 27).
Funding Transportation ResponsiblyCurrent Policy: Presently, 0.5% of the 5% sales tax goes to the Transportation Trust Fund; another 1.25% goes to local education funding, 1% is returned to localities, and 2.25% is deposited into the General Fund.
My Proposal: Once the state posts 3% revenue growth and this growth is adequate to cover the cost of the transfer in any given fiscal year, the share of the sales tax dedicated to the Transportation Trust Fund for non-food purchases would permanently double (to 1%), the difference coming from the General Fund, which is reduced to a 1.75% share (SB 132)
Securing the Vote
Current Policy: Any person identifying themselves by affirmation may cast an untraceable ballot, a policy open to voter fraud
My Proposal: Require all voters to show some form of ID (which can include a utility bill, government check, etc.) or cast a provisional ballot, a sensible, non-intrusive step to combat voter fraud that has been consistently upheld by the courts (SB 134)
I think these are common-sense proposals that Virginians of all political stripes should be able to get behind, and I will continue to advocate for them in Richmond.
I would like to hear your ideas for reform as well, so please email me at mark@markobenshain.com with your ideas and suggestions.
Mark Obenshain
Virginia State Senator
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Article Content
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Article Content
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Article Content
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Obenshain Appointed to Governor's
Commission on Government Reform
Appointment Provides an Opportunity to Promote
Smaller, More Efficient, Streamlined Government
HARRISONBURG -- Today, Senator Mark Obenshain (R-Harrisonburg) thanked Governor McDonnell for granting him the opportunity to serve on the new Governor's Commission on Government Reform and Restructuring, created by Executive Order No. 2 moments after McDonnell took office on January 16.
"It is an honor to be appointed to serve on the Governor's Commission on Government Reform and Restructuring," said Obenshain. "A serious examination governmental priorities and the manner in which state government provides services is long overdue. Governor McDonnell recognizes that 'we've always done it this way' is not a reason in and of itself, and that especially now, while revenues are low, it is essential that we prioritize and find more efficient and effective ways to provide key services. Streamlining government will not solve all our problems, but it is a vital step in the right direction."
The commission, to be chaired by Fred Malek, the founder and chairman of Thayer Capital Partners, consists of a bipartisan group of current and former legislators, local government officials, businesspeople, administration officials, and policy analysts from across the Commonwealth. Senator Obenshain is one of four senators tapped to serve, alongside Senators Mary Margaret Whipple (D-Arlington), Ryan McDougle (R-Hanover), and Louise Lucas (D-Portsmouth).
The Commission is charged with identifying opportunities for creating efficiencies in state government, exploring innovative ways to deliver state services at a better value to Virginia taxpayers, seeking out means to more effectively and efficiently perform core state functions, and examine ways for state government to be more transparent and accountable.
"Anyone who has ever interacted with state government knows how frustrating the process can be," said Obenshain. "Our responsibility is to scrutinize both what and how government delivers, and to ask whether services can be delivered more effectively and efficiently - and even, sometimes, whether government should be delivering it at all."
A leading proponent of auditing the Virginia Department of Transportation, a proposal adopted by the Governor, and of exploring opportunities to privatize Virginia's ABC stores, Senator Obenshain has long made government reform a top priority. "Serving on the Commission affords me an opportunity to push for much-needed changes in the way Virginia does business," said Obenshain.
"Governor McDonnell and I are both strong advocates of government reform, and I look forward to working with the Governor and my colleagues on the new reform commission," said Obenshain.
The Commission will hold its first meeting within the next month and will complete its initial report to the Governor by July 16, with a final report with recommendations to be issued by December 1.
Senator Obenshain represents the twenty-sixth district in the Virginia Senate. The district includes the city of Harrisonburg and the counties of Warren, Shenandoah, Page, Rappahannock and Rockingham (part).
ON THE WEB:
Mark's website: http://www.markobenshain.com
Mark's Facebook profile: http://www.facebook.com/markobenshainI look forward to serving you in this new capacity. If you have any ideas or suggestions for government reform, moreover, I hope that you will not hesitate to contact me by telephone at (540) 437-1451 or via email at mark@markobenshain.com. Many of the best ideas come from those "on the ground" dealing with government, so if you have ideas that should be brought before the Commission, I want to hear from you!
Article Content
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
Greetings!
Over the years I have spoken to many groups, but the group I addressed yesterday was particularly special. I had the great honor of speaking at a naturalization ceremony to a group of twenty-eight new citizens moments after they had taken the Oath of Allegiance.
Hailing from nineteen countries on four continents, these twenty-eight joined in one voice to swear their allegiance to the United States, declaring that they "support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic" and "will bear true faith and allegiance to the same."
It was a powerful moment, but only one of several during the ceremony. After local patriotic and service organizations had extended welcome to our newest citizens, Judge Welsh of the U.S. District Court for Harrisonburg opened up the floor to the new citizens, and a number of them took the opportunity to share why they sought citizenship, and what this country means to them.
The first to speak was an Iranian immigrant who said, "My husband fell in love with this country's capitalism, and I fell in love with this country's people." Another immigrant contrasted the poverty of his home country with the opportunities he has found here. One after another, they cited America's freedom, opportunity, and welcoming people, and in case it wasn't already sufficiently apparent, the miniature flags clutched by their friends and relatives, and the enthusiasm with which these new citizens and their friends and family said the Pledge of Allegiance, testified to the patriotism and love of country already present in these twenty-eight.
This was the first naturalization ceremony I've ever attended, and I just wanted to share some of that experience with you. If you know any of the twenty-eight who became American citizens yesterday, I hope you'll seek them out and congratulate them. And even if you don't, I hope you'll take a moment to reflect upon what citizenship means to you.
As I told these twenty-eight, citizenship is a powerful thing, and in this country, there is no higher title than that of citizen. Those of us who have known nothing else tend to take its privileges for granted - but I can assure you that these twenty-eight do not. We can all learn something from them, and maybe capture a measure of their enthusiasm.
The debate rages on about illegal immigration and its social and economic costs, and the issue returned to the forefront of public consciousness with the passage of controversial legislation in Arizona. It seems worthwhile, therefore, to take a moment to pay tribute to those who pursue citizenship through the naturalization process. We are, after all, nations of immigrants - as well as a nation of laws - and those who go through the process are to be commended - and welcomed.
One of my favorite Presidents, Ronald Reagan, once spoke of receiving a letter that stuck with him. You can go live in Turkey, the letter said, but you can't become a Turk. You can go to live in Japan, but you cannot become Japanese - or German, or French. But, he concluded, "Anyone from any corner of the world can come to America and be an American."
Yesterday, these twenty-eight did just that, and it was moving to behold.
During the ceremony, I could not help but think that this really is what America is all about. This really is a country based on a shared idea, not a shared history, and this diverse group of immigrants, from many nations and just as many walks of life, came together because they share the core convictions that shape our nation; because they believe that America is a great country, and that they wanted it to be their country.
Yesterday, they realized that dream. The rest of us, meanwhile, would do well to reflect, from time to time, on what these immigrants clearly understand: what a great privilege it is to be a citizen of the United States of America.
Thank you for granting me the opportunity to share this experience with you.
With best regards,
Mark D. Obenshain
Virginia State Senator
The following are articles from newspapers, blogs, and other news sources throughout the Commonwealth and the country featuring members of the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus.
|
|
|
Socialize with me.