Virginia Senate Republican Caucus

Today, Senate Democrats exercised a partisan power play by using procedural tactics to defeat two bills sponsored by Republican legislators on party-line votes.  The Senate voted to re-refer Senate Bills 601 and 102 to the Committee on Finance with a recommendation that they be carried over for the year.  Senate Bill 601, patroned by Sen. Frank Wagner (R-Virginia Beach), dealt with the allocation of future offshore drilling royalties.  Senate Bill 102, patroned by Sen. Ryan McDougle (R-Hanover), would reverse the years in which the state budget is approved to bring the budgeting process more in line with the term of Virginia’s governors. 

“Today’s actions clearly demonstrate the lack of vision the Senate Democrats have for Virginia,” commented Wagner.  “Bills that were reported from the Finance Committee with bipartisan majorities just last week are being killed in purely partisan fashion without the courtesy of true up or down votes.  Such flip-flopping is no way to govern the Commonwealth.”

Wagner’s bill, which was included in Governor Bob McDonnell’s legislative package, would allocate funds received from future off-shore drilling royalties.  As introduced, the bill would allocate 80% of such royalties to the Transportation Trust Fund.  On Monday, the Senate adopted an amendment that would instead allocate 70% of such royalties to the General Fund and the remaining 30% between localities and the Virginia Coastal Energy Research Consortium.  The vote to adopt the amendment was largely along party lines.

“On Monday, the Democrats voted to change the original purpose of my bill,” Wagner noted.  “While I did not support their amendment, I decided the underlying purpose of the bill was important enough to go forward.  How they could go from turning the bill into something they preferred to outright defeating their own concept is beyond me.

“While the royalties allocated by this legislation are not yet a reality, we need to be prepared when we start receiving them,” Wagner noted.  “Thanks to the recent actions of Senators Warner and Webb, these royalties are closer than ever to being realized.  This legislation served two important purposes – encouraging greater energy independence in America and allocating revenue that would truly help Virginia to build and maintain its infrastructure.  To derail such important legislation for purely partisan ends is not responsible governance.”

Immediately after the Senate’s action on Senate Bill 601, the Senate considered McDougle’s Senate Bill 102.  McDougle’s legislation would alter the timing of Virginia’s budgeting process so that a biennial budget would be adopted in odd-numbered years and revised in even-numbered years.  The lengths of General Assembly sessions would be altered accordingly.  This legislation was introduced by McDougle during the 2009 session also.  It has been considered by the General Assembly as far back as 2005 – when the concept passed unanimously in the Senate.  While the Governor has expressed support for the measure, it was not on his legislative agenda.  The vote to re-refer the bill to Committee was also on a party-line vote with Sen. Chuck Colgan (D – Prince William) crossing the aisle to vote with Republicans against the motion.

“This year is the perfect year to pass this legislation,” McDougle commented.  “The current struggle over the budget has only been exacerbated by the fact that the introduced budget we have before us was written by a Governor who is no longer in office and is based on priorities vastly different from those of our current Governor.  For weeks, we have heard the Senate Democrats call for leadership on the budget.  Yet when given an opportunity to show leadership themselves, the members of the majority party balked.

“This legislation was not partisan, was focused on good governance, and was a recommendation of the Wilder Commission,” noted McDougle.  “There is no reason why a Governor should propose a budget during their last month in office when they will not be present to guide the bill through the General Assembly or to govern within the constraints of the budget they proposed.  That is why I introduced this legislation last year.  And that is why the Senate passed it unanimously in 2005.  I cannot imagine what has changed so drastically in five years that the bill has gone from being unanimously supported to being killed through procedural nuances.”